Magnifier Search

SGS v. Paraguay

Type of decisionDecision on Jurisdiction
Date of decision12 February 2010
Tribunal
Stanimir Alexandrov (President)
Donald Francis Donovan
Pablo García Mexía
Legal instrumentBIT between Paraguay and Switzerland (1992)
Related decision(s)Award, 10 February 2012
Further informationFull text of the decision

Statements from this decision

You are currently viewing the statements in their context. To view them in a list, click here.
A state cannot rely on its national legislation to question the jurisdiction of a treaty based tribunal
A contract qualifies as an "asset" under the investment definition of an IIT
The performance of an agreement regarding the provision of comprehensive import supervision services cannot be regarded as outside the territory as long as a substantial and non-severable aspect of the overall service is provided within the host state.
The fact that a contract, which constitutes an investment within the IIT, could not be registered as such under domestic law does not affect an "in accordance with the law" requirement
A state's non-payment under a contract is capable of giving rise to a breach of the FET standard
An umbrella clause cannot only be breached by actions that a commercial counterparty cannot take; i.e., an abuse of state power is not required
Without any textual limitations, an umbrella clause may apply to all kind of commitments by a state
An exclusive jurisdiction clause in a contract does not bar a tribunal from examining a contract breach as a breach of an umbrella clause
An exclusive jurisdiction clause in a contract does not bar a tribunal from examining a contract breach as a breach of an umbrella clause
An exclusive choice of forum clause in a contract cannot bar a tribunal from examining treaty based claims
Distinction between violation of a contract and a treaty
A state's consent to arbitration is expressed in the IIT
A state cannot rely on its national legislation to question the jurisdiction of a treaty based tribunal
The definition of investment within Article 25 ICSID Convention is generally left to the consent of the parties; the consent serves as a lex specialis with regard to Article 25 ICSID Convention

Feedback

Above you will find 12 statement(s) from this decision. Please note that when viewing the statements in their context, the same statement may appear multiple times if it is relevant for more than one topic. Did we miss something? Feel free to send us your suggestions!