Magnifier Search

Cemex v. Venezuela

Type of decisionDecision on Jurisdiction
Date of decision30 December 2010
Tribunal
Gilbert Guillaume (President)
Georges Abi-Saab
Robert B. von Mehren
Legal instrumentBIT between Netherlands and Venezuela (1991)
Related decision(s)
Further information

Statements from this decision

You are currently viewing the statements in their context. To view them in a list, click here.
The principle of effectiveness (effet utile) cannot be applied on interpreting a state's unilateral statement, such as an alleged offer to arbitration
The principle of effectiveness (effet utile) only excludes interpretations which would render the text meaningless when a meaningful interpretation is possible; it does not require that a maximum effect is given to a text
If a national law has effect on the international plane, e.g. a state's unilateral offer to arbitration, that law has to be interpreted according to the rules of interpretation of international law, not the state's national rules of interpretation
On interpreting unilateral declarations, such as a state's offer to arbitration, the VCLT can be applied analogously to the extent it is compatible with the sui generis character of such declarations
If a broad definition of investment in an IIT does not include an explicit reference to direct or indirect investments, it covers indirect investments made by indirect investors
If a broad definition of investment in an IIT does not include an explicit reference to direct or indirect investments, it covers indirect investments made by indirect investors
If a national law has effect on the international plane, e.g. a state's unilateral offer to arbitration, that law has to be interpreted according to the rules of interpretation of international law, not the state's national rules of interpretation
On interpreting unilateral declarations, such as a state's offer to arbitration, the VCLT can be applied analogously to the extent it is compatible with the sui generis character of such declarations
The principle of effectiveness (effet utile) cannot be applied on interpreting a state's unilateral statement, such as an alleged offer to arbitration
The principle of effectiveness (effet utile) only excludes interpretations which would render the text meaningless when a meaningful interpretation is possible; it does not require that a maximum effect is given to a text
The principle of effectiveness (effet utile) cannot be applied on interpreting a state's unilateral statement, such as an alleged offer to arbitration
A state's interpretation of its unilateral consent to jurisdiction is not binding on the tribunal; the tribunal is always judge of its own competence
If a national law has effect on the international plane, e.g. a state's unilateral offer to arbitration, that law has to be interpreted according to the rules of interpretation of international law, not the state's national rules of interpretation
On interpreting unilateral declarations, such as a state's offer to arbitration, the VCLT can be applied analogously to the extent it is compatible with the sui generis character of such declarations
A state's interpretation of its unilateral consent to jurisdiction is not binding on the tribunal; the tribunal is always judge of its own competence

Feedback

Above you will find 6 statement(s) from this decision. Please note that when viewing the statements in their context, the same statement may appear multiple times if it is relevant for more than one topic. Did we miss something? Feel free to send us your suggestions!